See your holdings the way the market's AI sees them
Companies are disclosing less, and what they do publish is read by algorithms before an analyst opens it. Eunoic runs the same investor-grade assessment across 30,000 reports, 50,000 companies and 150,000 news sources, so you can tell substance from spin across a portfolio, and help the companies you own close the gap.
Used by companies worth over $1.5 trillion to fix how their sustainability work is read.
The commitment has not changed. The signal has.
PRI signatories have committed to integrating sustainability into investment decisions. That commitment stands, and the evidence behind it stands: more than a thousand studies point the same way on long-horizon returns.
What has changed is the data. Regulatory scope has been cut. Some companies keep doing the work and stop talking about it. Ratings from 600 providers disagree with each other. Reading every report across a portfolio takes analyst weeks, and the reports were written for people, not for the systems now doing the reading.
Eunoic exists for the investor who still has to evidence integration, with less disclosure to work from.
Offer one
An independent read of every holding's disclosure
Four questions, answered per company, on the same method the rating agencies' AI applies.
- Does the disclosure survive a machine read?
- The four-gateway assessment scores every report and website on accessibility, comprehensibility, emphasis and alignment. A strong programme that is explained badly scores like a weak one. Now you can tell the two apart.
- Is the company saying what its sector prices?
- Market benchmarks show which sustainability themes rating agencies weight and which ones investors reward with capital, by sector and industry. Alignment scoring shows where a company over-claims, under-reports or leaves a material theme out.
- Does the story match the coverage?
- Media sentiment across 150,000 sources, by theme, set against what the company publishes. When the two diverge, that is the gap the market prices, and the first place to look for greenwashing.
- Which themes actually move the stock?
- Company-level alpha analysis regresses stock performance against sustainability sentiment, theme by theme, at 95% confidence. Market-revealed materiality, not the company's own framing.
The deliverable: a portfolio screen
Your holdings, ranked on the four gateways, alignment and sentiment, with the outliers flagged, delivered as a report you can put in front of an investment committee. Priced per portfolio, quoted on request.
Run it on a portfolioOffer two
Lift the signal quality of your own holdings
Most of what looks like poor sustainability performance in a portfolio is poor communication of real work. That is fixable, and fixing it is stewardship with a measurable result.
Portfolio companies use the platform to see which themes matter in their industry, write and rewrite their reports and websites against that benchmark, and check every draft through the four gateways before publication. The improvement shows up in the next assessment, and in the next rating cycle.
How it works for an investor
- •Companies join under your relationship, each in its own workspace, on the standard plans.
- •You see every company's newest report, where it sits in its industry and how it moved, in one view.
- •Priorities, writing and assessment run inside each company's team. Your analysts stay analysts.
Proof
- •CEZ Group moved from BBB to AA at MSCI in its first year on the platform and won the Reuters Responsible Business Award for reporting and transparency.
- •Colliers went from last in its peer group on public sustainability sentiment to first, measured quarterly across 150,000 sources.
- •América Móvil raised its MSCI rating three years running.
How it reads a company
Four gateways, in sequence. Each depends on the one before it.
-
1
Accessibility
How much of the document a machine can extract at all. Below 90%, nothing downstream is reliable.
-
2
Comprehensibility
How easily people and algorithms understand what was extracted, scored on a consensus of nine readability formulas.
-
3
Emphasis
How much of the content is about sustainability rather than generic corporate language.
-
4
Alignment
Whether the themes emphasised match what the market prices in that industry.
Every score is placed in the distribution of the company's industry peers, from a corpus of 30,000 reports spanning 35 years. There is no invented pass mark. The standard is what the market already reads.
What you get, in one place
- •Market-revealed materiality by industry, and rating-agency consensus beside it.
- •A four-gateway assessment of any report or website, in minutes.
- •Misalignment flags: over-claiming, strategic omission, themes missing altogether.
- •Peer groups you define, compared on communication quality and sentiment.
- •Media sentiment across 150,000 sources, by company and by theme.
- •Company-level alpha: which themes move which stock.
- •A dated, repeatable screen you can show your own regulator.
Run it on your portfolio
Send us the list. We return the screen. Thirty minutes to walk through it, and a clear view of which holdings are doing the work and which are only saying so.